The Going Wage Is Not Necessarily a Fair Wage

Reference code: C26-08 Why an employer and worker can agree on a wage that has already been shaped by employer labor-market power An employer offers a wage. A worker accepts it. Most people naturally assume that the agreement establishes a fair wage for the work. Modern research on labor monopsony gives us substantial reason to […]

Why People Have Difficulty Seeing That Capitalism Can Be Redesigned

Reference code: C26-07 This commentary is part two of a two-part set of commentaries that examines capitalism design. One of the most persistent obstacles to thinking seriously about economic reform is not that people have carefully considered different ways of structuring capitalism and rejected them. Most people have never been asked to consider that question. […]

The 24th Thing They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism: Capitalism Itself Can Be Redesigned

Reference code: C26-06 This commentary is part one of a two-part set of commentaries that examines capitalism design.  Ha-Joon Chang’s 23 Things They Don’t Tell You About Capitalism challenges a deceptively simple assumption: that capitalism is a fixed economic system whose institutions follow naturally from markets themselves. Across the book, Chang shows instead that capitalism […]

The Seller’s Last Question: What Happens to the Employees?

Reference code: C26-05 La-Z-Boy, Foreign Competition, and the Succession-Planning Case for a CCE When the owner of a successful manufacturing company begins planning for succession, the discussion quickly acquires its own vocabulary. The advisers speak of valuation, financing, taxes, representations, indemnities, working capital, and the quality of the prospective buyer. Those questions matter. A seller […]

Why Commons Capitalism Matters

Why Commons Capitalism Matters Commons Capitalism is not important merely because it is non-confiscatory and non-cohort-limited. It is important because those features may make Commons Capitalism capable of doing what most alternative enterprise systems cannot: correct or ameliorate capitalism’s largest structural defects — concentrated wealth accumulation and the reduced distribution of enterprise wealth to workers […]

Calvinism, Capitalism, and Commons Capitalism: Moral Legitimacy, Surplus, and the Politics of Accumulation

Reference code: C26-02 One of the most important historical contributions of Calvinism to capitalism was not merely economic discipline or work ethic. The deeper contribution was moral legitimacy. Calvinist moral psychology helped construct a framework through which private accumulation could be understood not only as lawful, but as morally justified. That distinction matters because markets alone […]

Why Commons Capitalism Took So Long to Emerge

Reference code: C26-01 Most people assume that, if an idea is sound, someone would have built it already. Commons Capitalism invites that assumption because the core concept is simple: keep markets and competition, but forbid private capture of surplus. If that is all it is, why did it not show up decades ago, fully formed, […]

A Keynesian Critique of Commons Capitalism

Reference code: C25-20 Why Keynes Would Pay Attention John Maynard Keynes would not have approached Commons Capitalism as a moral manifesto. He would have approached it as a machine: Does it keep employment high, keep investment steady, and keep the economy from falling into avoidable slumps? From that angle, Commons Capitalism is immediately interesting because […]

Polycentric Governance Tends to Outperform Traditional Capitalist Governance

Reference code: C25-16 The Concentrated-Power Problem in Traditional Capitalism In a conventional capitalist firm, economic authority tends to collapse into a single dominant center even when the org chart looks more complex. Shareholders (or the capital markets that discipline them) set the value target, the board sets the strategic frame, and senior management controls the […]

How Reserves and Funds Protect Workers in a Downturn

Reference code: C25-15 This commentary is one of a two-part set of commentaries that examines  worker precarity in down economies. What “Reserves and Funds” Mean in Practice Reserves and internal funds reduce precarity only when they operate as pre-positioned commitments rather than discretionary gestures. The practical question is not whether the system has money. The […]